Victoria Baths reopens, then shuts out
Victoria Leisure Centre has reopened to the public after its £9m refit. This is an occasion to celebrate the return of a key community facility to the area, but there are aspects of the design, particularly it's relationship to the new Sneinton Market Square, that are very poor indeed.
What makes this breathtakingly shoddy is that every single one of these faults was pointed out to the architects, Levitate, and their clients, Nottingham City Council, at pre-planning stage, yet each one has surfaced in the final scheme.
I've mentioned the benches... My question 'are they impossibly big steps or painful benches?' seems to have been answered by the addition of seat backs: "They're benches, now f**k off" is the message I'm getting. There's more than a whiff of afterthought about these, you get the sense that there are 15 backless metal bench seats in storage somewhere...
Worse is the obscuring of the glass into the pools at ground floor level. A fundamental design flaw in this project was placing the pool next to the public space (and there were alternative locations, by the way: the pre-existing large pool was ideally sited...). The architects claimed that the windows into the pool would animate the market square, the doubters pointed out that noone likes to parade around in their swimmers in a big public window, but especially not the people that this facility, as a community pool, should be aimed at (you know, the overweight, people with little kids, members of ethnic minorities would don't exercise because of fears about privacy....).
Sure enough, the windows have been obscured with wind-o-lene (classy touch) even before opening, so that they now resemble a shut up shop (see photos above showing night time views into the pools, before the centre opened). Expect this to become permanent and to extend up the glass, as early morning serious swimmers begin to complain about the glare off the water from the east facing glass wall... (yes, another flaw pointed out at pre-planning stage).
At an urban level, the obscuring if the glass all along the market square leaves a grand total of NO animating windows (that is, ground-floor openings showing activities within the building) along this edge of the square. Given that this was the problem with the original building in the site (and even that had ONE ground-floor opening to the square) this is at best a opportunity missed. It also contradicts the advice of the "Gehl Report"- the neighbourhood design plan commissioned to kick start the Sneinton market regeneration, and the Council's own Nottingham Urban Design Guide.
And yes, sadly this was also pointed out at pre-planning stage.
The main thrust of the 'Gehl Report' was to prioritise successful urban space over shiny new glory projects. It seems that no one was listening. I remember the look on one councillor's face when it was suggested to him that this was not the best location for a pool hall on the site. Devastated he muttered "but then we'll have to find another use for that side of Sneinton Market". Well, yes, if you want public spaces to work you do need to think about it.


